Critical Thinking

The necessity of critical thinking has played an important role in Truth in Society lately. In each discipline, discussions have been based around situations where one must think critically, as a simple answer is not clear. In Religious Studies, our discussions have mainly been addressing the question of who the book of Revelation is benefiting, and why. Naturally, this question has branched off into many different directions. In English, we have been stopping, looking back, and thinking twice about sentences we might normally read casually. This process helps one to discover the pre-existing beliefs of the author, and how they effect the story(deciphering whether or not the text is subjective). In Journalism, we've recently been discussing the controversy surrounding 9/11; mainly the ethics behind taking photographs of unpleasant events. Once again, this situation doesn't have a straightforward answer, therefore assessing the situation critically is essential. As the three disciplines once again unite as one, I expect that the focus on critical thinking will continue to be prominent.

Seperate Disciplines

I've really enjoyed the time we've spent in Aquinas focusing on each discipline separately. What I've particularly enjoyed is our focus on the reports written by war correspondents in journalism. We've read some interesting stories, watched some intriguing films, and have had some good class conversations on this topic. The fast pace in religious studies (switching from Cults to Mary Magdalene to the book of Revelation) has also been quite informative. We've briefly looked at the significance of wording in sentences, and its impact on meaning in English. However, while the three courses are separated, I wish more of an emphasis would be put on the English discipline. Religious Studies and Journalism have entered worlds of their own, but our English course has yet to do so. In my opinion, our English class would benefit from such activities as poetry analysis, Shakespeare analysis, short story analysis, or the study of a novel, and written reports based on these works. But overall, the divided course segment of Aquinas has been very interesting.

Back At It

We have just completed our first week of Aquinas for 2010. So far, I feel the course is heading in a good direction. Particularly the pace of Journalism has been exciting to me. It is quite interesting to look at the reasoning behind people's beliefs during large scale events with significant consequences. An example of this is during Hitler's rise to power, sparking World War II. Otto Adolf Eichmann's beliefs often seemed to be inconsistent, resulting in his destructive actions despite his "gentle nature". The "Banality of Evil", as it's referred to by Hannah Arendt, has not been uncommon throughout history. It is interesting to compare this with one's belief system, and can be inspiring for a person to begin to look more closely at the consequences of what may seem like the "normal" thing to do.